I picked this up last fall when one of my local bookstores put it on sale – I’d been eyeing it for a while, then it won the Pulitzer, and the next time I went book shopping it was 30% off. I really love it when things come together like that!
This story’s main character is Thomas Wazhashk, a Chippewa council member and member of the Chippewa Turtle Mountain tribe in North Dakota. He works as a night watchman in a jewel-bearing plant, which he campaigned to bring to the town near the reservation to create job opportunities, and is a community leader and advocate. Set in the early 1950s, Thomas is working to stop a termination bill recently introduced in Congress, which would get rid of the Turtle Mountain reservation, as well as long-lasting federal support for the tribe. This book is a fictional retelling of Erdrich’s grandfather, and his community fight against the termination bill in real life.
However, main character is a very loose definition here. In reality, this is the story of a community and a culture, with the point of view fluidly shifting in between a complex cast of characters. The two most commonly heard voices are of Thomas and a young woman named Pixie, who works at the plant in order to support her family, there are many POVs characters are either members of the tribe or on the reservation, sometimes for just a chapter or a page, sometimes for a lot longer. (It’s told in third person, past tense.) It is more the story of a community and a culture than of any one person, which is important for what the book sets out to accomplish.
TNW is written with the Chippewa world view as the default, to the point that the few non-Chippewa POVs we get feel very discordant and strange in the world of the book. Erdrich does a truly excellent job of setting the Chippewa POV as the default, while still acknowledging that white culture exists and both influences and pushes in on Chippewa culture. What “everyone knows,” what “people say,” is time and time again set to a Chippewa default, without the need for caveats.
She knew, as everyone around her knew, that the soul after death sets off to a journey to the next life.
People said that only the most powerful medicine people could fling that twisted mouth.
pp. 279 & 419
And it’s not just the characters who do this; when the book moves to a more third-person objective narrator, this is the worldview of that narrator and therefore the book. It forces the (non-Chippewa) reader to slowly disengage with what they assume as the default, what they think everyone knows, and enter into a world where they’re the visitor. This is something that many books do, and try to do, but I’ve rarely read one that does it so well. In particular, it never feels like the audience for this book is white Americans, which would inherently center a non-Chippewa worldview. A lot of new concepts and some words have to be picked up by context clues, and I’m sure I just missed some things entirely. It’s not excluding anyone; it’s just not apologizing for what it is, which is a Chippewa story.
There’s an element of magical realism throughout the book. (Magical realism may not be the right term, given that it’s happening within the context of a living religion, but it’s the best that I have.) For the Chippewa characters, ghosts and spirits and omens appear, animals speak in human languages, all accepted without hesitation or surprise. I really liked this; I love magical realism and I think it’s one of the most effective ways to immerse someone into a different worldview, because it really forces the reader to accept things without necessarily understanding the underlying reasoning; they have to figure that out for themselves.
While the other two second-wave Native American renaissance books I’ve read, There, There and The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian, both focus on individual struggles with identity, TNW is the story of a culture more than a person. Though Erdrich spends a page acknowledging the difficulties of defining yourself as Native American in the time Thomas grows up in, for the most part, the characters in the book are very secure in their Native identity. Instead, what this books does – and does so well – is portray a culture in conversation, with itself, with its past, future, and present, and with the environment and broader cultural context it exists in. This was absolutely my favorite part of the book. It, moreso than any other piece of media I’ve engaged with, paints the picture of a Native community as a breathing, living, modern culture. Not that works like “Rutherford Falls” and the abovementioned books haven’t, it’s just that this book in particular pulls the reader into the conversation as it happens, forces the reader to look at the shaping forces, both internal and external, and to see the complexity of this conversation from so many angles and viewpoints.
…she had asked him to make the grave house because she knew he did it the old way. Except, Thomas wondered, was this really the old way? Biboon said that his father remembered a time when the dead person was carefully wrapped in birchbark and then fixed high in a tree. It seemed better.
pg. 321.
The final part of this book that I very much wanted to discuss was its very feminist bent, particularly in the viewpoints of its female characters. There are a wide variety of women, who all wanted different things and who lived very different lives. Within the conversations they have with each other are breathtakingly honest observations about the realities of women’s lives. There’s some strong parallels drawn between the white people’s treatment of the Native Americans and men’s (including Chippewa men’s) treatment of women, both stemming from the fact that the “other” – Native Americans and women, respectively – aren’t viewed as human by the more powerful group. They exist in some other category, somewhere between object and subhuman. Erdrich subtly but consistently differentiates between the experience of the men and the women, and of the white man and the Native Americans (I don’t think we get any white women as POV characters in this book.) At the same time, the injustices particular to women are allowed to stand on their own, to be their own thing with their own considerations in navigating the world.
Jack would have tampered with her slightly, just enough so that when somebody else came along she’d have that shame, then more shame, until she got lost in shame and wasn’t herself.
pg. 296
I definitely think this book was an excellent choice for its Pulitzer and I’m going to be thinking about it for a long time. I also think it’s a really important addition to the growing body of modern Native American literature, especially in conversation with works that are more focused on individual journeys.